Tagged: termination

Employment

Employment Terms and Terminations: It’s Different in the States

Employers sometimes include fixed terms of employment in their employment agreement. Sometimes a fixed term is meant to prompt the parties to renegotiate at the end of the term. Sometimes a fixed term is meant to document the point in time where the parties have, in fact, agreed that the employment will end. Sometimes a fixed term is designed to create a point in time where the employer can end the employment without having to pay severance. But sometimes employers include a fixed term in an employment agreement without carefully considering the legal consequences. Under U.S. law, those consequences can be significant. One fundamental difference between employment law in Canada and employment law...

Employment / Litigation / M&A

Termination for Cause in the United States: It’s Whatever You Want it to Be

The default rule in most U.S. states is at-will employment. This means that either the employee or the employer may terminate the employment relationship at any time, without notice, for any reason—other than a discriminatory or retaliatory reason. A reason is discriminatory if it is based upon an individual’s status as a member of a protected class, such as race, gender, national origin, or religion. A reason is retaliatory if it relates to an individual’s protected activity, such as whistleblowing or raising concerns regarding the terms and conditions of employment. Parties can opt out of the default at-will rule by entering into an employment agreement that provides the employee with severance unless the...

Employment

Damages: The Dark Side of Having Employees in the United States

Canadian employment law is, in many ways, far more employee favorable than U.S. employment law. With the exception of a few states, employment in the United States is “at-will.” This generally means that either the employer or the employee may terminate the employment relationship without cause and without notice, so long as the reason for the termination is not discriminatory (e.g., based on age, race or gender) or retaliatory (e.g., in retaliation for the employee engaging in whistleblowing activity). U.S. employees also have far fewer privacy rights in the workplace. Employees generally have no expectation of privacy in any computers or other electronic devices provided by the employer. However, there is one aspect of employment...

Employment / M&A

Reductions in Force and the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act

It is generally a good idea for companies not to disclose biographical information about their employees, such as marital status, religion, or age. Good HR professionals counsel managers not to ask for such information during interviews, for example, in order to avoid claims of discrimination in hiring. Under U.S. law, however, there is an important exception to this well-advised general rule. Under the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (“OWBPA”), employers terminating two or more employees as part of a layoff and offering severance in exchange for a release must disclose the following information to each employee over 40 who is being terminated and offered severance: 1) a description of the class of employees...