Author: Randal R. Jones

Randy has over 25 years of experience counseling emerging, private, closely-held, and public companies in a wide range of general corporate and complex transactional matters. Randy’s practice concentrates on representing clients in domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, venture capital and other private equity and debt financings, initial and secondary public offerings, corporate governance compliance, securities regulation, and other business-related matters.

The Corporate Transparency Act: Deadline Approaching

This is a reminder that the deadline to file initial Beneficial Ownership Information Reports with FinCEN is January 1, 2025 for all non-exempt entities formed or registered to do business in the United States prior to December 31, 2023. The deadline is within 90 days of formation for all non-exempt entities formed or registered in 2024 (and within 30 days of formation for all non-exempt entities formed or registered on or after January 1, 2025). In January, we published this summary of the Corporate Transparency Act, in addition to our long form update on the CTA. Our attorneys are ready to assist with any questions you may have.

The Corporate Transparency Act: Are You Ready?

On January 1, 2024, new direct reporting requirements to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”), a bureau of the United States Department of the Treasury, became effective – known as the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”). Who must file? The CTA, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, apply to corporations, limited liability companies, limited partnerships and similar legal entities either formed in the United States (a “Domestic Reporting Company”) or formed outside the United States but registered to do business in the United States (a “Foreign Reporting Company”). Such entities must identify their natural person beneficial owners and “company applicants” (i.e. the person(s) responsible for the formation or registration of the entity), and disclose...

New SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules

Canadian issuers that are reporting issuers with the Securities and Exchange Commission should be aware of new rules that impose disclosure requirements regarding cybersecurity risk management, strategy, governance and incidents. The new rules have two basic components.   First, certain issuers will have new disclosure requirements regarding the registrant’s processes and policies for cybersecurity risk management, strategy and governance.  These disclosures (which we refer to as “risk management disclosures”) will be required in the registrant’s annual report. The new risk management disclosures apply to nearly all domestic SEC reporting issuers (including Canadian issuers that report on domestic forms) and those foreign private issuers that report on Form 20-F. Second, in the event of a material...

Implications of SEC Amendment to Insider Trading Safe Harbor for Canadian Issuers

On December 14, 2022, the SEC adopted final rules amending Rule 10b5-1, a safe harbor from liability under the U.S. insider trading rules.  The safe harbor permits directors, executive officers and others, including issuers, to engage in securities transactions while in possession of material non-public information, by entering into a binding contract, instruction or plan adopted prior to effecting the transaction and at a time when the seller or buyer was not in possession of material non-public information about the issuer. The new rules include a number of measures intended to limit certain potentially abusive strategies permitted under the old rules and certain new disclosure requirements intended to enhance investors’ understanding of the...

New NASDAQ Board Diversity Disclosure Rules

As discussed in more detail here, on August 6, 2021, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) approved NASDAQ Rules 5605(f) and 5606, which require each NASDAQ listed company (subject to certain narrow exceptions) to (i) publicly disclose, to the extent permitted by applicable law, information on the voluntary self disclosed gender, racial characteristics and LGBTQ+ status of the issuer’s board members, and (ii) have at least two “diverse” board members or explain why it does not have two diverse members meeting the applicable requirements. Issuers with five or fewer board members are required only to have one “diverse” board member. Canadian issuers that are NASDAQ listed are subject to the...

SPAC Talk: Important Considerations for Private Companies Evaluating a SPAC Going-Public Transaction

One of the hottest going-public trends in 2020 and 2021 has been the rise of SPACs – Special Purpose Acquisition Companies – as a vehicle for private companies to go public. SPACs are shell companies that are formed, funded and taken public for the purpose of later acquiring an operating company. By merging with a SPAC, the private company effects a reverse takeover, inheriting the SPAC’s existing cash and taking over its management. SPAC mergers have quickly increased from being occasional to outpacing the number of traditional IPOs. A SPAC merger involves different players that can have different motivations than a traditional IPO. In a traditional IPO, a private company may slowly prepare...

What Cross-listed Canadian Companies Need to Know About the Impact of the U.S. Government Shutdown on SEC Operations

As a result of the partial U.S. government shutdown that began on December 22, 2018, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), one of nine federal agencies affected, recently published its Operations Plan Under a Lapse in Appropriations and Government Shutdown (sec.gov/files/sec-plan-of-operations-during-lapse-in-appropriations-2018.pdf), which went into effect on December 27, 2018. The Operations Plan offers important guidance regarding the significant impacts of the shutdown on the agency’s activities. Additional guidance is also available from the SEC’s Divisions of Corporation Finance (here: sec.gov/page/corpfin-section-landing) and Investment Management (here: sec.gov/investment-management). Issuers and practitioners should make contingency plans to address the effects upon ongoing or planned securities offerings, filings, and requests for interpretive guidance, among other things. A few important highlights:...

U.S. Subsidiaries of Canadian Companies Face Imminent Reporting Deadline For Federal Survey

Canadian companies with U.S. subsidiaries and investments should note upcoming deadlines for filing reports required by U.S. Department of Commerce rules. These mandatory reports are required to be filed with the Bureau of Economic Analysis (“BEA”) within the U.S. Department of Commerce by May 31, 2018, if made by hardcopy, or by June 30, 2018, if made electronically. The affected U.S. subsidiary companies are those in which a non-U.S. person owns or controls, directly or indirectly, 10 percent or more of the company’s voting securities if the U.S. subsidiary company is incorporated, or in which a non-U.S. person holds that same degree of ownership or control through other means if the U.S. subsidiary company is...

Equifax Data Breach: Preliminary Lessons for the Adoption and Implementation of Insider Trading Policies

The recent data breach at Equifax, a major credit rating agency, has provided an unexpected reminder of the importance of well-structured insider trading policies. Following last week’s announcement of the data breach, it was disclosed that certain Equifax executives, including its Chief Financial Officer, sold a portion of their holdings after the cyberattack was discovered, but before the news was publically announced. While Equifax has stated that the executives had “no knowledge of the intrusion at the time they sold their shares,” the developing story illustrates some of the risks attendant to sales of securities by insiders of public companies. Canadian issuers registered with the SEC or trading in the U.S. markets will...

Exporting Products Across the Border – Avoiding Product Liability and Other Litigation Risks in the United States

Canadian companies exporting products across the border into U.S. markets face significant risks of litigation or regulatory action arising from products sold and distributed in the United States. In a recent article, our colleague Kent Schmidt outlines ideas for managing these risks and creating a litigation risk profile around the four key areas of vulnerability: product liability claims, breach of warranty claims, false advertising and consumer protection claims, and claims related to collection, use, or compromise of consumer data and personal information. The full text of Kent’s article is available at www.dorsey.com/newsresources/publications/articles/2017/05/avoiding-unnecessary-us-litigation. For a more thorough discussion on how Canadian companies can avoid product-related claims in the United States, we invite you to...