Author: Chris Doerksen
Chris helps clients raise money by selling equity and debt, buy and sell assets and businesses, manage their SEC disclosures, implement corporate governance structures, list on stock exchanges, and establish equity-based compensation arrangements. He currently serves as the head of Seattle’s Corporate department and co-chair of the Canada Cross-Border Practice Group.
View Full Bio on Dorsey
A Canadian company that proposes to grant stock options or other types of equity compensation to persons in the United States must comply with the securities laws of the state in which the recipient is located, unless the type of equity being issued (e.g., the underlying common shares, in the case of options to purchase common shares) is listed on a “national securities exchange” such as the NYSE, Nasdaq, and NYSE MKT. This means that private companies, Canadian public companies that are not listed in the United States, and Canadian companies that are listed in the United States only in over-the-counter markets such as the OTCQX, OTCQB, or Pink Sheets, are required to...
Canadian manufacturers who sell products through U.S. distributors should ensure that they take appropriate action to establish their U.S. intellectual property rights, and to deal clearly with those rights in their cross-border distribution agreements. In a recent post on Dorsey’s IP blog, The TMCA, Sandra Edelman discusses the difficulties encountered by Covertech Fabricating, a Canadian manufacturer of protective packaging and reflective insulation, in establishing that it was the rightful owner of the trademarks in its branded products, not its U.S. distributor. Read her analysis of the recent court decision here: thetmca.com/who-owns-that-trademark-the-manufacturer-or-the-exclusive-distributor/
This week, the SEC approved a rule that would require broker-dealers to settle most securities transactions on a T+2 basis (shortening the current regime from T+3), effective September 5, 2017. See additional information in the post from our partner Jason Brenkert here. Will Canadian regulators follow suit?
In December 2015, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) announced an amended regime for a prospectus-exempt rights offering in Canada. This amended regime allows certain public companies in Canada to conduct a prospectus-exempt rights offering without prior CSA review of the rights offering circular, and using a greatly simplified rights offering circular that assumes, without incorporation by reference, that the shareholder is familiar with the issuer’s other continuous disclosures. While the new regime revitalized the market in Canada for rights offerings, it raised several questions regarding the extension of the rights offering to U.S. shareholders. Form F-7 under the Multi-Jurisdictional Disclosure System (MJDS) has historically provided a means for eligible Canadian issuers to register...
In recent years, many Canadian companies have sought to create a U.S. market for their shares by listing on the OTCQX. Qualifying Canadian companies that have their primary listing on the Toronto Stock Exchange, the TSX Venture Exchange or the Canadian Securities Exchange may generally obtain a quotation on the OTCQX or the next lower tier of the OTC Markets, the OTCQB, without filing a registration statement with, or becoming subject to ongoing reporting requirements with, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. During 2016, the initial listing requirements for OTCQX included a minimum share price of US$0.25, a minimum market capitalization of US$10 million, an operating business, no current bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings,...
Being a “foreign private issuer” is very important to a Canadian company’s treatment under U.S. securities laws. If a Canadian company ceases to qualify as a foreign private issuer under the rules of the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC), it must generally: Change the way in which it offers and sells its own securities to persons in Canada and other non-U.S. jurisdictions, including the imposition of U.S. legends regardless of the jurisdiction of the purchaser, Begin reporting with the SEC unless its securities are held by a sufficiently small number of persons, and Report with the SEC on U.S. domestic forms rather than the more liberal forms that apply to most Canadian companies...
Most non-underwritten private placements of securities by Canadian companies to U.S. investors are made in reliance upon Rule 506 of Regulation D. Since September 2013, this exemption has been subject to “bad boy disqualifications.” Generally speaking, a company is prohibited from relying on Rule 506 if the company, any of its predecessors, any of its affiliated issuers, or any of its directors, officers, general partners, managing members or promoters has been subject to certain convictions, orders, judgments, decrees in the United States or suspension or expulsion of membership from certain organizations in the United States. In addition, if any person has been or will be paid (directly or indirectly) remuneration for solicitation of...
You’re a Canadian public company with no U.S. operations. You don’t file reports with the SEC. You plan to merge with another Canadian public company in a share-for-share exchange, structured as a Canadian plan of arrangement. Do you need to hire U.S. counsel to assist on this Canadian deal? Yes. Canadian public companies invariably have shareholders resident in the United States. If the acquirer will issue shares to the target shareholders, or if there will be an amalgamation in which shareholders of both companies receive shares of amalco, the transaction will be deemed to involve the offer and sale of securities to the U.S. shareholders. This requires either registration with the SEC and...
