Tagged: SEC

Cannabis / Capital Markets / Securities

Canadian Cannabis Companies Begin to Trade on National Stock Exchanges in the United States

With the listing on May 24th of Canopy Growth Corporation (Canopy) on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), both NASDAQ and the NYSE have permitted Canadian cannabis companies to trade on their respective exchanges. Canopy, the first Canadian cannabis company to list on the NYSE, follows Cronos Group Inc. (Cronos), which was the first Canadian cannabis company to list on a national stock exchange in the United States when it listed on NASDAQ in February. While neither exchange has formally adopted a policy on the listing of cannabis companies, informally they are willing, on a case-by-case basis, to accept a company with cannabis operations, so long as the company complies with all relevant...

Capital Markets / Securities

SEC Issues New Cybersecurity Guidance

On February 26, the SEC published interpretive guidance to assist public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents. The SEC’s new guidance reinforces and expands on its October 2011 guidance, emphasizing the importance of adopting sound cybersecurity policies and procedures and safeguards against insider trading in the event of a potentially material cybersecurity breach. Read more about the new guidance in our recent eUpdate: www.dorsey.com/newsresources/publications/client-alerts/2018/03/sec-issues-new-cybersecurity-guidance.

Securities

Changes to Upcoming Auditor’s Reports

The United States Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) issued new standards for auditor’s reports that will effect Canadian issuers who are SEC registered. The initial changes go into effect for issuers with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2017. Our understanding is that some Canadian auditors for issuers who are MJDS eligible will try to combine the Canadian and U.S. requirements into one auditor’s report that complies with both sets of rules, while other Canadian auditors will prepare their reports solely in compliance with the new PCAOB requirements as Canadian rules permit auditors for dually registered issuers to file auditor’s reports solely in compliance with PCAOB standards. Canadian issuers who are not...

Capital Markets / Securities

Interesting Facts About U.S. Private Placements

This week the SEC Division of Economic and Risk Analysis published a new report including a wealth of data regarding recent trends in public offerings and private placements of securities. The report includes a number of interesting facts about U.S. private placement practice, including: In the last few years, issuers have raised 2-3 times more capital through Regulation D than through Rule 144A. Rule 506(b) remains the most popular way to raise capital under Regulation D, with 97% of all funds raised under Rule 506 being raised under Rule 506(b), rather than the newer Rule 506(c), with issuers choosing not to take the additional steps required by Rule 506(c) to generally solicit investors. Only...

Corporate / Securities

Foreign Private Issuer Calculation Date for Calendar Year-End Foreign Issuers is June 30, 2017

As a reminder to all foreign issuers that have a December 31 fiscal year end, the upcoming end of their second fiscal quarter, June 30, 2017, will be the calculation date for their status as a foreign private issuer (“FPI”) for purposes of both the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). We recommend that issuers begin the analysis early to determine whether actions should be taken prior to the June 30th date to avoid an unintentional loss of FPI status. An early determination of the business nexus test (as described below) is also needed to...

Benefits / Securities

State Securities Laws – Granting Options and Equity Comp in the United States

A Canadian company that proposes to grant stock options or other types of equity compensation to persons in the United States must comply with the securities laws of the state in which the recipient is located, unless the type of equity being issued (e.g., the underlying common shares, in the case of options to purchase common shares) is listed on a “national securities exchange” such as the NYSE, Nasdaq, and NYSE MKT. This means that private companies, Canadian public companies that are not listed in the United States, and Canadian companies that are listed in the United States only in over-the-counter markets such as the OTCQX, OTCQB, or Pink Sheets, are required to...

Capital Markets / Securities

Compensation to Newsletter Writers Must Be Disclosed

On April 10, 2017, the SEC’s Division of Enforcement brought enforcement actions against 27 individuals and entities behind various alleged stock promotion schemes. These actions arose when public companies, through promoters or communications firms, hired newsletter writers to generate publicity for their securities without publicly disclosing that the writers were being paid. While it is not illegal to hire newsletter writers, Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) requires that newsletter writers fully disclose both the amount and the nature of the compensation received, including the dollar amount of a cash payment, the number of shares issued, or any other compensation. Additionally, newsletter writers and persons who adopt, approve or...

Capital Markets / Securities

The Danger of Paying Finder’s Fees to Unregistered Broker-Dealers

We get asked from time-to-time whether it is advisable for issuers to pay fees to unregistered “finders” for introducing potential investors in the United States to the issuer in connection with securities offerings. The short answer is “no.” Most finders are engaged by issuers under finder’s, advisory, or other arrangements, which typically require payment of “success fees” upon completion of a financing transaction. While these arrangements are sometimes structured to try to hide or disguise the true intent of the arrangement, payment of transaction-based compensation is treated by U.S. securities regulators as a nearly-conclusive indication that a person is engaged in the securities business and should be registered as a broker-dealer. The relevant...

Securities

United States Moves to T+2 Securities Settlement

This week, the SEC approved a rule that would require broker-dealers to settle most securities transactions on a T+2 basis (shortening the current regime from T+3), effective September 5, 2017. See additional information in the post from our partner Jason Brenkert here. Will Canadian regulators follow suit?

Benefits / M&A / Securities

New Approach for the Assumption of Options in M&A

A Canadian SEC reporting company that looks to acquire a company with outstanding equity grants in the United States will frequently need to address the question: What alternatives are available for the assumption of the target’s outstanding options or other equity-based compensatory awards? Under U.S. law, both the grant of the equity award and the exercise or conversion of the equity award must be registered under the 1933 Act or satisfy an available exemption. For Canadian issuers that are SEC reporting companies, the alternative approaches available to satisfy the 1933 Act requirements for the exercise or conversion of the assumed awards were formerly restricted to (i) an S-8 registration statement (either existing or...